Talk:Showdown Update/@comment-36249842-20190724133330/@comment-36912561-20190725131239

Well ... it’s good to see a much sober tone in the comments now. Last time got such a bad taste, I stopped commenting on that topic.

However, again dragging the old issue: believe in what you feel most comfortable but as mentioned earlier, those statistics if presented the whole "real" picture, we wouldn’t have written these comments on this issue. Clearly someone, a group got some parts as expected but there are many others that didn’t.

This was what I was trying to tell that the stats, though exhaustive doesn’t paint the full picture. If it did, other users, multiple ones, wouldn’t have commented otherwise, including me.

The point is some might have got the parts from zero, but in many other cases we are left with the same condition as before, i.e. you don’t get the parts that you require and lack while some exotic parts are raining if you already keep a healthy stock.

Consider this: a while ago there was a top end pro player Damon DDR. When he quit as a pro from A8, this lack of parts when needed was stated as a primary reason. I asked him personally afterwards via messaging and he reconfirmed it. If there are so many people stating the opposite of what you state in the stats, how can you say it’s giving the full picture?

Agreed its a great work, kudos to those writers, but it gives a general guideline which may or may not come true with all the players, aka, playing your luck.

Hope this time it clears things a bit ... 🤔