Thread:Guy Bukzi Montag/@comment-27524282-20180809215005/@comment-34918040-20180810032924


 * " But I, OTOH, can see a triple-winded parody here on his very nick"

And that's exactly why I thought it's just a second account of an "ordinary" user. It's quite unlikely that someone joins a Wiki with a nick that is already a parody of existing users and discussions which he must have followed beforehand. And it wasn't just a dumb troll account. You could already see in his way of creating mock usernames whom he deemed "worth" of a more flattering name or a more insulting one ("PukeStar").

And concerning your question: Personally, I could handle his weird sense of humour quite well. But his more or less subtle stings that he generally used to keep below a level of blatant offence seldom failed to hit their targets and often triggered other users who weren't that relaxed. So, in a way, he was a constant source of potential trouble. Can a forum stand this? I'd say yes, but I can understand an admin who has better things to do than keeping track of a user who constantly tests the limits of the community.

Another deletion that I just realized: Someone replied to my comment that no one cares and that the car sucks—repeating the boring rant about the car that no one cares about either. I wouldn't have deleted the reply, although it was worthless and showed that the user didn't even get what I was writing. But as I haven't seen comments really relevant to the topic being deleted so far, I don't complain about this "mild" form of censorship.