Talk:McLaren MP4-31/@comment-31458611-20180203150211

Even though I'm confident that this page was lastly edited by a diligent and well-meaning person, I felt compelled to rewrite this:
 * "The MP4-31, while an extremely competent car that can compete with the Vulcan on many tracks, especially short ones, is extremely hard to obtain owing to its grueling Championship. Adding on to that, it has a tendency to skid randomly and is hence very hard to control.
 * "Still, the MP4-31 is a very useful addition to a player who does not have any top-tier S Class cars yet."

Reasoning: There was an involuntary oxymoron: an "extremely competent" car that has "a tendency to skid randomly" and is "very hard to control". (Like an extremely competent airplane with a penchant for stalling unpredictably.) And "extremely hard to obtain" and "grueling Championship" were subjective statements from a single experience. Or: go tell that to the quite a few people that (as commented on the Championship page) won the car at its low 1700s...

On a general scope, let's all please keep in mind that car pages like this are the first place newcomers visit looking for (supposedly) reliable information. See on the BMW Hommage page the comments with bitter regrets about following the "wiki advice" favoring 050x-etc. tunes for that car; it's a sad thing that we should ponder about.